Current:Home > NewsSenate rejects Mayorkas impeachment charges at trial, ending GOP bid to oust him -ProfitMasters Hub
Senate rejects Mayorkas impeachment charges at trial, ending GOP bid to oust him
View
Date:2025-04-18 01:34:44
Washington — The Senate quickly dispensed with the two impeachment charges against Department of Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, convening a short-lived trial Wednesday that brought an end to a months-long effort to punish the secretary for his handling of the southern border.
The Senate's 51-member Democratic majority voted to dismiss both charges as unconstitutional over the objections of Republican members. The entire proceeding lasted just three hours.
Mayorkas became just the second Cabinet secretary in U.S. history to be impeached when the House charged him in February with "willful and systemic refusal to comply with the law" and a "breach of public trust." Democrats strongly opposed the impeachment effort, decrying it as a political stunt and saying the allegations constituted a policy disagreement that fell far short of the constitutional threshold for impeachment.
Under the Constitution, the Senate is responsible for holding a trial to determine if impeached officials are guilty and should be removed from office. The House transmitted the articles on Tuesday, and senators were sworn in as jurors Wednesday afternoon. Sen. Patty Murray, a Washington Democrat and the president pro tempore of the chamber, presided over the trial. Senators took turns signing an oath book, an indication of the gravity of the proceedings.
The outcome of the trial was a foregone conclusion, given the Democratic control of the chamber. Nonetheless, Senate Republicans called on Democratic leaders to hold a comprehensive trial, and a handful of GOP lawmakers attempted to delay the proceedings. When Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer tried to move forward with an agreement to allow for a period of debate after senators were sworn in, Missouri GOP Sen. Eric Schmitt objected, accusing Schumer of "setting our Constitution ablaze" by refusing to hold a full trial.
Without the agreement, Schumer then opted for a different path forward — asking senators to vote on a point of order over whether the first impeachment charge met the threshold of "high crimes and misdemeanors" outlined in the Constitution. The move effectively blocked Senate Republicans from presenting their own points of order, which could have derailed the proceedings further.
Senators ultimately voted 51-48 along party lines that the first impeachment article was unconstitutional, with Sen. Lisa Murkowski, an Alaska Republican, voting present. On the second article, senators voted 51-49, with Murkowski joining her fellow Republicans.
Before the votes, Sen. Ted Cruz, a Texas Republican, argued that Schumer presented no evidence that the charge was unconstitutional and motioned to move the impeachment trial into a closed session for debate. His motion fell short.
"The majority leader's position is asking members of this Senate to vote on political expediency to avoid listening to arguments," Cruz said. "The only rational way to resolve this question is actually to debate it, to consider the Constitution and consider the law."
A number of other Senate Republicans took turns offering different motions Wednesday afternoon to delay an end to the trial. But each fell short in the Democratic-controlled chamber.
Mia Ehrenberg, a DHS spokesperson, said in a statement that the Senate's decision to reject the impeachment articles "proves definitively that there was no evidence or Constitutional grounds to justify impeachment."
Kaia HubbardKaia Hubbard is a politics reporter for CBS News Digital based in Washington, D.C.
TwitterveryGood! (5127)
Related
- 2025 'Doomsday Clock': This is how close we are to self
- Several Trump allies could be witnesses in Georgia election interference trial
- Banned New Zealand Olympic runner arrested in Kenya over sexual assault and weapon allegations
- Minnesota murder suspect still on the run 1 week after being accidentally released from Indiana jail
- Trump suggestion that Egypt, Jordan absorb Palestinians from Gaza draws rejections, confusion
- Police suggested charging a child for her explicit photos. Experts say the practice is common
- Israel strikes alleged Syrian military structures. It says the buildings violated a 1974 cease-fire
- New York pay transparency law drives change in job postings across U.S.
- Current, future North Carolina governor’s challenge of power
- What is a government shutdown? Here's what happens if funding runs out
Ranking
- FACT FOCUS: Inspector general’s Jan. 6 report misrepresented as proof of FBI setup
- What is a government shutdown? Here's what happens if funding runs out
- Climate activists disrupt traffic in Boston to call attention to fossil fuel policies
- Parents, are you overindulging your kid? This 4-question test can help you find out
- Sonya Massey's father decries possible release of former deputy charged with her death
- What is a government shutdown? Here's what happens if funding runs out
- Why was a lion cub found by a roadside in northern Serbia? Police are trying to find out
- It's a fiesta at USPS
Recommendation
What were Tom Selleck's juicy final 'Blue Bloods' words in Reagan family
'Persistent overcrowding': Fulton County Jail issues spark debate, search for answers
Novels from US, UK, Canada and Ireland are finalists for the Booker Prize for fiction
Kim Kardashian is the only reason to watch awful 'American Horror Story: Delicate'
All That You Wanted to Know About She’s All That
Former fashion mogul pleads not guilty in Canadian sex-assault trial
Manhunt underway for child sex offender who escaped from hospital
Two debut books make the prestigious Booker Prize shortlist