Current:Home > StocksFTC wants to ban fake product reviews, warning that AI could make things worse -ProfitMasters Hub
FTC wants to ban fake product reviews, warning that AI could make things worse
View
Date:2025-04-17 21:06:20
If the Federal Trade Commission has its way, businesses could soon be fined a hefty sum for hosting or promoting fake product reviews online.
Faux five-star and rave reviews of less-than-stellar consumer goods can boost businesses' profits while deceiving consumers, according to the agency, which has proposed a rule to crack down on companies that buy, sell or promote phony user ratings of their products. If the rule is finalized, violators would be subject to penalties of up to $50,000 per infraction, depending on the case.
"The FTC has seen a massive increase in online reviews in the past few years," Serena Viswanathan, associate director of the FTC's division of ad practices, told CBS News. "We're all using them now to make decisions on whether to buy a product, where to stay on vacation. But unfortunately, with the rise in online reviews we have seen that bad actors can manipulate or fake reviews to deceive consumers for their own benefit."
New types of artificial intelligence tools, which can write human-sounding, but bogus, product reviews, also threaten to compound the problem by enabling bad actors to crank out far more fake reviews, according to the consumer watchdog.
Deceptive reviews hurt consumers by making it hard to obtain factual information about products, regulators say.
"The FTC's proposed rule would make it crystal clear that it's illegal to do things like write or sell fake reviews from people who don't exist or never used the product, or to buy positive reviews or even buy negative reviews about your competitors," Viswanathan said.
Boosting "honest companies"
A steady stream of phony product reviews can boost an item's visibility among consumers while obscuring products from more trustworthy companies, according to experts.
"Our proposed rule on fake reviews shows that we're using all available means to attack deceptive advertising in the digital age," said Samuel Levine, Director of the FTC's Bureau of Consumer Protection said in a statement. "The rule would trigger civil penalties for violators and should help level the playing field for honest companies."
According to a U.S. PIRG estimate, between 30% and 40% of online reviews are "concocted or are in some way not genuine." Bogus reviews surged during the pandemic when U.S. shoppers made the bulk of their purchases over the internet versus in stores, the consumer advocacy group noted.
Nearly 90% of online shoppers rely on reviews to guide their purchase decisions, according to PIRG.
"Not only does this harm consumers who are trying to make informed buying decisions, fake reviews also hurt honest businesses who make sure their online reviews are genuine. When people lose confidence in reviews, legitimate positive reviews don't mean as much. So consumers lose. Honest businesses lose. Dishonest businesses win," PIRG said in a report.
Stopping hijackers
The FTC's proposed rule would make selling and buying fake reviews illegal, while also cracking down on a practice known as "review hijacking." This consists of repurposing a genuine consumer review written for one product so that it appears to pertain to a substantially different product.
Also under the proposed enforcement, company insiders cannot review their own products, and businesses cannot bribe people to leave positive reviews or threaten them if they leave negative reviews. Companies would be permitted to offer customers gift cards for leaving a review, so long as the business doesn't dictate what people say about a product.
"We really think that the possibility of significant financial penalties under a rule should make some of these bad actors think twice about writing fake reviews and selling fake reviews," Viswanathan said.
veryGood! (2)
Related
- Opinion: Gianni Infantino, FIFA sell souls and 2034 World Cup for Saudi Arabia's billions
- 16-year-old dies while operating equipment at Mississippi poultry plant
- Kylie Jenner Legally Changes Name of Her and Travis Scott's Son to Aire Webster
- Will the FDIC's move to cover uninsured deposits set a risky precedent?
- In ‘Nickel Boys,’ striving for a new way to see
- Inside the emerald mines that make Colombia a global giant of the green gem
- ‘Reduced Risk’ Pesticides Are Widespread in California Streams
- Silicon Valley Bank's collapse and rescue
- Will the 'Yellowstone' finale be the last episode? What we know about Season 6, spinoffs
- Boy, 7, killed by toddler driving golf cart in Florida, police say
Ranking
- The 401(k) millionaires club keeps growing. We'll tell you how to join.
- The U.K. is the latest to ban TikTok on government phones because of security concerns
- It's Equal Pay Day. The gender pay gap has hardly budged in 20 years. What gives?
- To Meet Paris Accord Goal, Most of the World’s Fossil Fuel Reserves Must Stay in the Ground
- As Trump Enters Office, a Ripe Oil and Gas Target Appears: An Alabama National Forest
- In-N-Out to ban employees in 5 states from wearing masks
- A Federal Judge’s Rejection of a Huge Alaska Oil Drilling Project is the Latest Reversal of Trump Policy
- The Fires That Raged on This Greek Island Are Out. Now Northern Evia Faces a Long Road to Recovery
Recommendation
New Zealand official reverses visa refusal for US conservative influencer Candace Owens
AAA pulls back from renewing some insurance policies in Florida
Pregnant Jana Kramer Reveals Sex of Her and Allan Russell's Baby
Racial bias often creeps into home appraisals. Here's what's happening to change that
New data highlights 'achievement gap' for students in the US
Dangerous Air: As California Burns, America Breathes Toxic Smoke
Facebook parent Meta slashes 10,000 jobs in its 'Year of Efficiency'
Startups 'on pins and needles' until their funds clear from Silicon Valley Bank